General Forum
Start a New Topic 
Author
Comment
View Entire Thread
Re: Re: Jesters

In relation to the comments about the Jesters and octogenerians, I feel that the comments made were nothing more then a blatent attempt to down-trodden the beauty that is the jesters. Guys that would normally go for the juguler at the thought of a double bounce, reduced to gentlemen by the pure majestic qualities and atmosphere of the touranament. To suggest changing this would end it, ever hear the saying "if it works don't fix it. It's worked for 25 years run by one of the true gentlemen of the game CHALKIE. Think of this, Women are timed with a 3rd party what are they one to one???????

Re: Re: Re: Jesters

agreed.
these are the rantings of a man who has never rolled one out of the nick.
tick tock up and down the wall. dullard.

Re: Jesters

Maybe Jesters in its current format has run its course and belongs in the past; it needs to be built upon to incorporate women and a bigger catchment area. I don't think this would detract from the atmosphere at all, it would merely heighten it. It has the potential to become very big for the amateur I feel, if only it could expand and appeal to a younger,wider audience (as i said in my original post).

Re: Re: Jesters

Yes but the question is it an amature tournament in your opinion??????


All views expressed on this Forum are those of the contributor and are not endorsed in any way by Squash Site. Squash Site reserves the right to preserve the integrity of the site by removing any anonymous or inappropriate messages. If a visitor feels any message is inappropriate please contact SquashSite